Valid Names Results
Paratrionymus Borchsenius, 1948 (
Pseudococcidae)
Nomenclatural History
- Paratrionymus
Borchsenius
1948c: 582.
Type species: Ripersia halocharis Kiritshenko
by original designation
.
accepted valid name
- Metadenopsis
Matesova
1966: 98.
Type species: Metadenopsis halogetonis Matesova
by original designation
.
junior synonym
(discovered by DanzigGa2015: 335)
Remarks
- Systematics: Subfamily: Pseudococcinae (Choi & Lee, 2022)
In the description of the genus, Paratrionymus, Borchsenius erroneously noted the presence of 3-locular pores and 3 pairs of cerarii in adult females. These mistakes may have provoked Matesova to describe a new genus, Metadenopsis. Danzig & Gavrilov-Zimin (2015) compared the type material of the two genera and ascertained that the species are identical except for the presence of a few tubular ducts in M halogetonis and none in Ripersia halocharis. (Danzig & Gavrilov-Zimin, 2015)
- General Remarks: Good definition and characters of the adult female given by Borchsenius (1948c, 1949) and by Tang (1992).
Keys
- DongZhWu2017: pp.594-595
(
Adult (F)
)
[Pseudococcinae in China]
- DanzigGa2015: pp.323-324
(
Adult (F)
)
[genera in Metadenopus (g/g)]
- DanzigGa2013a: pp.215-216
(
Adult (F)
)
[Key to Pseudococcidae from Russia and Neighboring Countries] Key as: Metadenopsis
- Tang1992: pp.92
(
Adult (F)
)
[China] Key as: Metadenopsis
- Borchs1949: pp.87
(
Adult (F)
)
[Palaearctic region] Key as: Metadenopsis
Associated References
- BenDov1994:
catalog, pp. 228, 286
- Borchs1948c:
description, taxonomy, pp. 582
- Borchs1949:
description, taxonomy, pp. 165
- DanzigGa2013a:
description, taxonomy, pp. 216, 220
- DanzigGa2015:
diagnosis, key, pp. 323, 335-337
- DongZhWu2017:
key, pp. 594
- Gavril2007:
taxonomy, pp. 1
- Mateso1966:
description, taxonomy, pp. 98
- MorrisMo1966:
taxonomy, pp. 147
- Tang1992:
distribution, host, pp. 97-98, 147
2 Species
